Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#11
Targeting a massive group for the actions of a select few is fairly dumb, if you ask me. Its the same as being a racist, just in a different context. And it disregards race :P I think you get what I mean, I've got a headache at the moment, so please excuse any errors for the time being o.O

And I'm not exactly safe, since ALL my planets are in G2 (Except for a couple, which I don't currently use anyways). I just don't build a lot of them, my schedule doesn't allow me to control many more than what I have. You already know my major planets, so I'm actually one of the most vulnerable, since I don't have many places to hide my fleet.

Please elaborate on your last statement, as well.

Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#12
The_Templar wrote:I was talking about all T_F, not you personally. Many of them have already paid the price on yours
and curtis' behalf. You speak from a relatively safe position, you haven't got many planets in G2.
And it's not a question of attention. If you look in the past posts, you 'll see that I 'm a relatively quiet user. I post mostly when I want to heat things up.
Maturity is relative, at least for us gamers, and at least during our gaming time.
You don't seem very detached yourself.
im so sick of you just shut up its obvious your a 3 year old.if your gonna attack other people because of something i did then that shows how mature you are grow up body :?:

1 WARNING FOR FLAMING. -Slash
Image

Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#13
curtis wrote:
The_Templar wrote:I was talking about all T_F, not you personally. Many of them have already paid the price on yours
and curtis' behalf. You speak from a relatively safe position, you haven't got many planets in G2.
And it's not a question of attention. If you look in the past posts, you 'll see that I 'm a relatively quiet user. I post mostly when I want to heat things up.
Maturity is relative, at least for us gamers, and at least during our gaming time.
You don't seem very detached yourself.
im so sick of you just shut up its obvious your a 3 year old.if your gonna attack other people because of something i did then that shows how mature you are grow up body :?:
Wow, you aren't making it any easier on your alliance.

I think its actually pretty common in the game to target other members of an alliance when you are in conflict. You are the one that instigated the whole thing by scanning some of his planets. Then when he retaliated, you did nothing but egg him on more and more. Now some of your alliance members have been hit and you continue. Don't you realize this is not going to make things any better?
Image

"You are in a position to demand nothing. I however, am in a position to grant nothing."

Khan Noonian Singh

Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#14
Khan wrote:
curtis wrote:
The_Templar wrote:I was talking about all T_F, not you personally. Many of them have already paid the price on yours
and curtis' behalf. You speak from a relatively safe position, you haven't got many planets in G2.
And it's not a question of attention. If you look in the past posts, you 'll see that I 'm a relatively quiet user. I post mostly when I want to heat things up.
Maturity is relative, at least for us gamers, and at least during our gaming time.
You don't seem very detached yourself.
im so sick of you just shut up its obvious your a 3 year old.if your gonna attack other people because of something i did then that shows how mature you are grow up body :?:
Wow, you aren't making it any easier on your alliance.

I think its actually pretty common in the game to target other members of an alliance when you are in conflict. You are the one that instigated the whole thing by scanning some of his planets. Then when he retaliated, you did nothing but egg him on more and more. Now some of your alliance members have been hit and you continue. Don't you realize this is not going to make things any better?
seriously does it look like i care?
Image

Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#17
From a logical standpoint, it would be idiotic to allow pissed off enemies to rebuild, now with ACS attack soon to be activated. It would be in the best interest of his empire to demolish all who oppose him. Though morally and considering this is simply a game it would be nice of him to allow others to rebuild. In the end there is no 100% right way of doing things, its simply how you view the situation.
Oppose me, you oppose death. Grim Reaper hasn't lost one yet.

Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#19
Ah, the leader at last...
Although, my friend, I must admit that your post comes a little outdated.
I will gladfully answer your question:
Transgalactic attacks are not my favourite. I haven't seen you anywhere in G2, otherwise I would have paid you a visit, you can be sure.
Since your alliance is a training alliance, I 'm sure you don't mind that I gave a little bit of "training" to your members. First of all, they don't fleetsave. Secondly, when they fleetsave, they don't do that from their moons, even though they happen to have moons. Thirdly and most importantly, they probe much higher ranked players and then they whine about the consequences and mock the rightful retaliation in the forums. Finally, when the winds of destruction blow towards their home, they look for a hitman :lol:
Take time to browse other topics in this forum and also "General Discussion" forum. You have my respect for granted, since you are the leader of the alliance, so I will answer to every one of your arguments considering I am talking to an equally ranked player, although this is not the case.
Plus: your General's mocking attempts that you will see if you take the time to browse the forums,
have been one of the primary causes of my offensive.
Regretfully, he was not so eager to defend curtis in the field of battle as he was eager to defend him in the forums.
However, after the episode "The_Templar vs Curtis: The Demolition" I have given up my offensive against T_F and gone back to my usual and boring construction and logistics business. It is up to you (meaning T_F) whether I stay there or return to the field of battle.
Destroy it and in three days I will rebuild it

Re: The_Templar [RAWK] vs T_F (Collection)

#20
The_Templar wrote:Ah, the leader at last...
Although, my friend, I must admit that your post comes a little outdated.
I will gladfully answer your question:
Transgalactic attacks are not my favourite. I haven't seen you anywhere in G2, otherwise I would have paid you a visit, you can be sure.
Since your alliance is a training alliance, I 'm sure you don't mind that I gave a little bit of "training" to your members. First of all, they don't fleetsave. Secondly, when they fleetsave, they don't do that from their moons, even though they happen to have moons. Thirdly and most importantly, they probe much higher ranked players and then they whine about the consequences and mock the rightful retaliation in the forums. Finally, when the winds of destruction blow towards their home, they look for a hitman :lol:
Take time to browse other topics in this forum and also "General Discussion" forum. You have my respect for granted, since you are the leader of the alliance, so I will answer to every one of your arguments considering I am talking to an equally ranked player, although this is not the case.
Plus: your General's mocking attempts that you will see if you take the time to browse the forums,
have been one of the primary causes of my offensive.
Regretfully, he was not so eager to defend curtis in the field of battle as he was eager to defend him in the forums.
However, after the episode "The_Templar vs Curtis: The Demolition" I have given up my offensive against T_F and gone back to my usual and boring construction and logistics business. It is up to you (meaning T_F) whether I stay there or return to the field of battle.
Your point is totally correct Templar, the minority of the players in my alliance are quite lazy and do not bother fleetsaving therefore are practically giving there resources away whilst i enforce the fact that fleet saving is a big priority to become successful at this game. If they spy on higher ranked players obviously they are trespassing so probley will pay the price for that too..

I will enquire abut My Generals mocking too as i havent really been looking through the forums untill now so i may post in future references etc...

Obviously my members are profitable therefore i see no reason why you shouldnt attack.... isnt that the aimof the game....?? ahaa..

Respects,
Black1
" You Build It.... I'll Recycle It...."