Istalris [RAWK] -vs- Cataraz [AZG] (3 RIP kill) TD- 259M

#1
Watched this guy for a couple of days, he didn't fleet save, hit him hard when he didn't have the duet to move. I used a lot of LF fodder here, hence my big losses, but hey still made a lovely profit. Not the best hit on the forum today but another AZG bites the dust huh? ;)

The attacker has won the battle !
You receive 820862 units of Metal, 263164 units of Crystal and 150384 units of Deuterium.
The attacker has lost a total of 65.414.500 units.
The defender has lost a total of 194.115.700 units.
A debris field containing 103.434.720 units of Metal and 46.953.000 units of Crystal has formed in orbit around the planet.
The probability of creating a moon is : 20 %
A moon has formed around the planet ***** [x:xxx:xx] !


DF recovered. GLOTR and enjoy the moon (use it to fleetsave ;) ).

-Istalris-
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...

Re: Istalris [RAWK] -vs- Cataraz [AZG] (3 RIP kill) TD- 259M

#6
Urweirdsaysi wrote:Ugh...I just wanna know how the hell people get so good at tracking fleets o.O
LOL! I didn't track this one, he left it sat in front of me for like 3 days straight. He basically asked me to come recycle it for him. Would've been a top ten too if SBT hadn't got that number 1. :lol:

-Istalris-
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...

Re: Istalris [RAWK] -vs- Cataraz [AZG] (3 RIP kill) TD- 259M

#10
Squirrel wrote:Nice hit, LF suck as fodder. Maybe LF will be good when RF comes in but till then...

Shame you missed out on a top 10 :cry: If there was a top 20, you would be in there!
Haha, i guess. :P

Does anyone use HF as fodder? Personally i've never built on in my life, trying to figure out a way of saving my bigger ships from damage without losing 5k LF's in the first round. :?

-Istalris-
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...