Re: ACS DEFEND TIMES

#11
Urweirdsaysi wrote:How's the weather up there on your high-horse?
Touché :D

Adressor frankly it seems to be you who is only reading bits and pieces mate, I specifically said that the times that they stay is what I was talking about, it is also the entire topic of the thread. The mention on the bug was a side note saying that the full return time bug is a pain in the *** and needs fixed.
Image
++MORTURI NOLUMNUS MORI++OMNISSIAH SAEVIO PROCUL VESTRI HIC++VOS ERO DEFAECO++NEX UT HOSTILIS DEUS OF MACHINA++

Re: ACS DEFEND TIMES

#12
Hey, the thread was about ACS defense, HE was the one that brought up the "bug" stuff.I simply responded from the aspect of the thread TOPIC as it is not a bug. his comment I believe was teh first to even mention "bug". NO definition, just "that bug needs to be fixed" what bug? there was no mention of a bug until him. So you can see my confusion.. sorry ill try to be a friggin mind reader next time if that pleases you more. Next time detail wtf you mean imo. My high horse is fine btw.. yee haaa, im sure your pack mule will do you just as well.

Meanwhile back on the subject.

Re: ACS DEFEND TIMES

#13
Sadbutrue wrote:that is why you only get one chance to acs defend properly or you have to wait for the fleet to come back from the destination. practice your timing kids
What SBT mentioned is a bug.
adressor wrote:HE was the one that brought up the "bug" stuff.
He was me
adressor wrote: there was no mention of a bug until him. So you can see my confusion..
Not really since it was mentioned if you read the whole thread.
adressor wrote:Next time detail wtf you mean imo. My high horse is fine btw.. yee haaa, im sure your pack mule will do you just as well.

Meanwhile back on the subject.
Ill make sure to spell it out. My pack mule does me just fine by the way, on the whole it stops me mouthing off. You could take the lesson.
Image
++MORTURI NOLUMNUS MORI++OMNISSIAH SAEVIO PROCUL VESTRI HIC++VOS ERO DEFAECO++NEX UT HOSTILIS DEUS OF MACHINA++

Re: ACS DEFEND TIMES

#14
you stop mouthing off? when did that happen? i missed it. and as i said before.. i noted an AGREEMENT on the bug, simply clarifying your inability to be consise. I read SBT as saying he wanted a small window and IF YOU MISSED IT, you needed to wait for the recall time not as a bug, as a feature that needed to be there to "punish" the defenders inablility to calculate.

It will be nice to see you NOT mouthing off tho..

Re: ACS DEFEND TIMES

#15
RogueSpearofTRA wrote:Actually that bug needs fixed, it doesnt help the game at all.
This was the first time "bug" was mentioned. What SBT mentioned is not a bug.
Bobrox2000 wrote:the bug he is talking about is there one where you recall your fleet but have to wait the entire return time.
Which is what adressor was saying. This thread is not about a BUG of recalling, it is about the increment of time you acs defend.
Urweirdsaysi wrote:How's the weather up there on your high-horse?
What is it with you guys? Someone comes in and makes sense and all of a sudden they are on a high horse for pointing out that it was not a bug being talked about in this suggestion thread as someone else said it was?

I suggest you guys quit slapping at each other and lower your testosterone levels. Game suggestions is not the place for arguments. Either you like the idea the OP suggests or you don't. Don't start a flaming contest in here.
Image
Just when you thought your were in control... I proved you wrong!

Re: ACS DEFEND TIMES

#20
In that case witchywoman, my apologies, I thought I was clear and concise enough. Considering as adressor was the only poster confused and the other posters were not I assumed the problem was him, and did not appreciate the flaming. I was talking about the increments, I merely passed a comment that the recall bug/glitch/feature needs fixed.
Image
++MORTURI NOLUMNUS MORI++OMNISSIAH SAEVIO PROCUL VESTRI HIC++VOS ERO DEFAECO++NEX UT HOSTILIS DEUS OF MACHINA++