Page 1 of 4

IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:24 pm
by big-fat-cow
it *****. damage + 50% needed.

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:12 pm
by Doomrager
No thanks I thank there good the way they are -1.

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:51 pm
by schnitter
you gotta be kidding right, and to think the lack of an IPM bashing limit wasn't enough...big no

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:39 am
by big-fat-cow
really? who use it? if you calculate the cost and damage it really is not efficient

anyways idea rejected, please close thread

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:16 pm
by Cypher
I also agree that the increase to damage is not needed,
They do become worth it if there is a large fleet or lots of resources sitting behind the shell.
big-fat-cow wrote:anyways idea rejected, please close thread
Only 3 people have disapproved so far...
who's to say the next 20 won't support the idea?

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:04 pm
by Choke
Make that 4 against
IPMs are bothersome enough bombarding your message box, and can do considerable damage anyway if someone is determined.

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:41 pm
by Scag
It is very strange that everyone who has posted against it hide their fleets behind massive amounts of defense.
IPMS either need more damage or we need a fleet interceptor to catch fleets in motion.
Its easy to say no dont do it zorg whem it is for your own benefit.
If you worry ipm will damage your defense build abms like everyone else
dont be such chicken shizz about your defense
GAWD!!! (Napoleon Dynamite)

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:56 pm
by schnitter
Scag wrote:It is very strange that everyone who has posted against it hide their fleets behind massive amounts of defense.
IPMS either need more damage or we need a fleet interceptor to catch fleets in motion.
Its easy to say no dont do it zorg whem it is for your own benefit.
If you worry ipm will damage your defense build abms like everyone else
dont be such chicken shizz about your defense
GAWD!!! (Napoleon Dynamite)

check who post before you talk crap kid.

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:30 am
by Scag
scnitter dont start acting like an imbecile now that you got you bc's smashed.
Before you start calling someone a kid you should try to act like a man.
Point being I fleetsave to protect my fleet, you all hide your fleet behind 40,000 lasers
So before you post that your against an idea you should also include that raising ipm damage is not in your best interest.
also I have treated you with respect so don't disrespect me ok kid.
now have one of your mod flunkies warn me for flaming you even though it is clear you just flamed me without so much as a slap on the wrist.
Another example of why mods shouldn't play and players shouldn't be mods.
KMA

Re: IPM needs a tweak

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:35 am
by schnitter
Scag wrote:scnitter dont start acting like an imbecile now that you got you bc's smashed.
Before you start calling someone a kid you should try to act like a man.
Point being I fleetsave to protect my fleet, you all hide your fleet behind 40,000 lasers
So before you post that your against an idea you should also include that raising ipm damage is not in your best interest.
also I have treated you with respect so don't disrespect me ok kid.
now have one of your mod flunkies warn me for flaming you even though it is clear you just flamed me without so much as a slap on the wrist.
Another example of why mods shouldn't play and players shouldn't be mods.
KMA
dude, did get all high just cause you smashed up zorg's new cruisers. nobody here does that, so if your going to talk crap to everyone you can kiss your fleet goodbye.
Warning flaming no need for that here.~LS