Forum rules
Display posts from previous
Sort by

Re: High rank fleeters should not ACS Defend players under 1

#32 by Deleted User
What? Lol well no suprises there
Tor-gard wrote:The subject says it all.

I was looking for a high rank fleeters ships and was about to give up. Then I remembered that he may have sent his fleet to a moon of a player under 10K .

I had a friend (under 10K) probe the planets and moons of this player that was under 10K and found the fleeter's fleet in ACS Defend.

Fri 4 Feb 2011, 22:16:12 Headquarters Espionage Report

Raw Materials Colony [X:XXX:X]
Metal 106.572 Crystal 63.760
Deuterium 39.489 Energy 0
Fleet
Reinforcements
Large Cargo Ship 27450
Elite Cargo 9
Death Star 230
Small Cargo Ship 1
Light Fighter 33883
Heavy Fighter 197
Cruiser 89
Battleship 29113
Colony ship 53
Recycler 16932
Espionage Ship 38700
Destroyer 87
Battlecruiser 25000
Lunar Guardian 2000
Defenses
Buildings
Robot Factory 2 ACS Depot 1
Research
Computer Technology 2 Energy Technology 1
Combustion Engine 1 Impulse Engine 3

Attack
Simulate
Probability of the destruction of the fleets intelligence : 0 %

My suggestion is that if you are under 10 K points and are in Noob protection, you should not be able to provide safe haven to high rank fleeters. In this case, it appears that the player in Noob status was setup just for this purpose, which I believe is not right. Notice, there are no buildings except the ACS Depot and Robot Factory. Each of the players planets are constructed just like the one above, and each has a moon.

This lends to make me think that this is just a second account of that high rank fleeter. And that is against the rules of having multiple accounts.
Totally agree with your point. I believe honestly that the only thing you should be able to do is transport to noobs

Re: High rank fleeters should not ACS Defend players under 1

#33 by Rjsturgill
Ok, Im finding this to be actually very funny, of course its not flaming in your eyes tom, its because its not IB members stating it. and as for IB members getting warning for flaming i just find that hilarious too, I forgot we are the only ones not allowed to speak our minds. Tom you may be the most biased mod in the forums and hopefully one day you learn not to be or you decide not to mod, either way i dont care because this will be my final post in these forums. It seems that no matter what is said, if it brought up by IB, its allowed to be flamed, and bashed and no one seems to care, so why should we continue to post?

On that note I'm sure I will be receiving a warning, but not like it matters as I'm done with this forum. If I have a top 10 hit, I will post it, otherwise goodbye forums. Hopefully one day we see more maturity here, and not just a bunch of players acting like 10 year olds.
Image
They may not like me, but they've gotta respect me!

Re: High rank fleeters should not ACS Defend players under 1

#34 by chrisOH
As for chrisOH you would flame your own mother if her initials were IB..
hell yeah and i would disown her! :lol:
Well at least we know how kron and kilos fleet save. By cheating. Interestin but not suprised
yes fish because i find this to be a epic FS location, i am a cheater for agreeing to that and agreeing that it shouldn't be taken out. :lol:
(pages of flaming to you)

(edit) after all the cheep shots i throw at these guys. i should at lest deserve 1 for baiting. even know it is mainly I.B. that posted against this in witch set's the argument so why use one name when they basically are coming as a group, so i refer back to them as such.
Image
how i'm still around.... no one knows...

Re: High rank fleeters should not ACS Defend players under 1

#35 by Zorg
In order to FS to a player under 10k, he needs an alliance depot...
In Speed universe, alliance depots are expensive already. Unless there is some sort of exploitation as it was in this case, this is a rare finding.

To prevent the appearing of such "utility" players, we will simply develop a script (already under construction) that will check for such posible utility accounts. Players found utilizing them, will be autobanned permanently.

There are many ways to do safe fleets saves, this is not a good way to fleet save anyway so I do not see it important to lock this option as it may serve ways of defense while making it easier to calculate return time for ninja.


Perhaps we should increase the initial cost of ACS depot in Standard and X-TREME as well.

Re: High rank fleeters should not ACS Defend players under 1

#37 by Istalris
Zorg wrote: To prevent the appearing of such "utility" players, we will simply develop a script (already under construction) that will check for such posible utility accounts. Players found utilizing them, will be autobanned permanently.
I can see this wreaking havoc if it doesn't work properly. :lol:
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...

Re: High rank fleeters should not ACS Defend players under 1

#39 by Istalris
pupairo12 wrote::shock: I didn't even consider that. Think of all of the innocent people who will have their accounts banned if the script doesn't work as it's supposed to.
Honestly mate, wouldn't be the first time something like that ripped apart the universe, anyone remember the massive VM kick of '09?
Image
When people ask me plz because it's shorter than please, i feel inclined to respond no because it's shorter than yes...
Recent Posts
HELP Topics
Theme variants
Post Reply

Return to “Game Suggestions”

cron