So let me get this right....Zorton in Massacre does a raid boost intentionally....came clean when Melkor called him out and an hour or so later posted on forums.......his score wasn't adjusted accordingly and nothing else happened except he took top raider award as predicted.........Gozar on the otherhand launches an attack after the downtime was brought forward and crashes fleet........the fleet was recovered as Zorg holds its hands up and states the attack ban was lifted early.....so far so good.........then I notice the raids and attack scores were also reduced ......hardly fair imo as it was a legitimate attack and the points were "earnt".........so all I want to know is this......does this ruling apply to everyone?

Trolling ends here. There has been enough patience lately to no avail. I cannot enforce you to have trust to game administration but I can enforce you to respect forum rules.

As a last stand, I will fully reply all accusations:
-Zorton made this test with administration awareness. Not that it was needed, but this excludes him from the evilness category.
-Zorton would win the top raider award anyhow.
-Administration is fully aware of this exploitation since day 1.
-It is again more of an urban legend issue than a realistic issue. People that top the lists deserve it.

Constructive reasoning as to how we can improve the scoreboard are welcomed. This suggestion though speaks about removal of scoreboard, therefore there is nothing more we can talk about here.

We got in mind two actions to improve scoreboard:
a)Exclude defense bashing from attacker & defender stats (A minimum of 5% of total amount lost in battle must be fleet in order for defense stats to count in scoreboard and statistics.)

b)Transport of resources to inactive planets or moons will no longer be possible.

You may freely comment on this ones in a new thread that I will create specifically for this reason.