I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I, too, still stand by what I said. This is a war game and, as we have seen all throughout history, war is never fair.

i really do not see any merit on this anti-theft technology or measure. debris field is and always been of stray. fingers keepers. is not a solid ground that u can claim. if u want to claim ur space dont create df but getting crashed. plain and simple.

SPY wrote:debris field is and always been of stray. fingers keepers. is not a solid ground that u can claim. if u want to claim ur space dont create df but getting crashed. plain and simple.

I am not sure what you mean by this part can you please clarify.

lIf you want to keep you DF safe, then don't get crashed. Which, in turns, means to Fleet Save. You have to fleet save no matter what style of play you have, but each style does it differently.

a little perspective.

Debris Field is created when a fleet is destroyed. Now if u are created your created DF should not be protected by you cause u lost the battle by first of all by getting crashed. secondly, if u are not crashed u dont have any df there so no need to protect it.

other perspective when u crash a fleet, how would u feel if the defender protects that df just because he was a stronger player and have a better df protection. all your effort is at a loss here.


i hope you see that.

if u want to claim ur space dont create df but getting crashed. plain and simple.

wanted to say "if u want to claim ur space dont create df BY getting crashed. plain and simple."

How is attacking someone and destroying their ships not earning that DF? Not to mention that attacking turtles doesn't produce very much DF anyway, since defenses don't produce DF.

love2scoobysnack wrote:

KarrothMelu wrote:I think that a DF should be a free-for-all. Especially after you get hit, because the attacker earned the DF.

Saying that they earned the DF is like saying that the Europeans earned The Americas and that it was only right for them to take all of the resources and put the Native into reservations.

Also, your analogy is incorrect. What I said is more like winning a battle and taking the rewards. Oh wait, that's exactly what it is.

wow, really off topic here, anyways, im a fleeter, i love getting DF, but this would be a ship, wich can only be used 1 at a time, it has a RF against LC, so if a cargo is sent with the recyclers the ship is auto destroyued,anyshp sent with recycler, the ant-theft is auto destroyed, except Esp probes...and scooby, lets keep things on topic

Beast(ahsan) wrote:wow, really off topic here, anyways, im a fleeter, i love getting DF, but this would be a ship, wich can only be used 1 at a time, it has a RF against LC, so if a cargo is sent with the recyclers the ship is auto destroyued,anyshp sent with recycler, the ant-theft is auto destroyed, except Esp probes...and scooby, lets keep things on topic

BUT sending a cargo with recs doesn't do anything anyway >.>... so why would that make any difference whatsoever?

cargos, lf, send basically anything with recyclers, because the theft has RF against reyclers only , but has RF from erything except esp probes, wich are neutral

How about a solution that might make everyone a little happier...

The ability to send out a patrol mission. Instead of calling it a DF guarding mission.... hehe.

If you think you are going to be hit, have been hit, hit someone else, then you can send a fleet of ships out to a patrol(should only be available on DF slot). This has the ability of possibly being able to ninja a bunch of helpless RCYs and lets face it, that prospect has to appeal to everyone here. We love to R & P the weak in this game

** Patrol Mission max patrol time is: 1hr ** That should prevent campers from extended patrols and camping out on the DF.

The other thing it would do is cause people to actually send escorts with the RCYs, which they should HAVE to do. I mean, they don't have cloaking devices right! You can't ESP a DF, so it puts an element of risk in the mission to recycle, makes it a bit more exciting than just clicking recycle!

We don't need new tech to accomplish, just more options with the current tech which I think is perfectly already capable of getting this done...