Page 1 of 2

Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:25 am
by RogueSpearofTRA
So, more and more recently, I've been seeing hits like this:

Attacker rjsturgill [x:yyy:zz]
Weapons: WWW % Shields: SSS % Armor: AAA%
Type Battlecruiser
Number 40.000

Defender RogueSpearofTRA [x:yyy:zz]
Weapons: WWW % Shields: SSS % Armor: AAA %
Type Solar Sat RIP R. Launcher Light Laser. Heavy Laser Gauss Cannon Ion Cannon Plasma Cannon S. Shield Dome L. Shield Dome
Number 1.650 1 1 100.000 10.000 500 2.000 198 1 1

The attacker has won the battle !
You receive 488534 units of Metal, 4368799 units of Crystal and 9217610 units of Deuterium.
The attacker has lost a total of 28.000.000 units.
The defender has lost a total of 223.330.000 units.
A debris field containing 10.249.500 units of Metal and 11.595.000 units of Crystal has formed in orbit around the planet.
The probability of creating a moon is : 19 %

Now I don't mind being attacked, it's part of the game and it's through me being lazy, let me just declare that straight out. However, for the resources created here, I cannot imagine the cost of the deuterium required to attack me (In this case it was across 11 systems, so this one may be an exception) could be profitable when sized up to the gains. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm not exactly the worlds biggest fleeter and have never had anywhere near 40k BC, 35k LG, 53k BS or any of the other numbers I've seen, but this just seems like attacking for the hell of it. Is the game slipping, or is there just something I'm missing? A week ago I was hit for a total of 7m metal, 4m crys, and 11m deut...across 3 galaxies by over 50k BS. It just seems a bit off to me :S

EDIT: WSA editted out. Woops.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:52 am
by Witchywoman
If I have my numbers right, to send 40k battle cruisers across 11 systems would cost approximately 4,200,000 deut. Of course to send 40k Battleships is double that. So you decide from those calculations if you think it was worth it. Of course I have seen fleet sitting on the ground and not really much resources and I will crash it just because they left it sit. *shrugs*

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:55 am
by RogueSpearofTRA
In that case this specific one was definitely profitable, thought it would have been alot more than that.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:57 am
by SPY
the duet cost for this hit was covered with the first raid i think.

also ship specs shouldnt be posted.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:44 am
by RogueSpearofTRA
Editted.
Aye this particular one definitely was, but been getting hit by massive amounts of ships over long distances for very low/negative profits. Just seems odd.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:33 am
by SPY
find out what kind of defense that takes the attack ship more than 9 mil deut to launch at ... that would probably save u but then again ppl have RIPs to get at u.

u cannot afford to leave that much around when ur defense is not sufficient to guard it. i am guessing u do not do daily farming of ur planets.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:09 am
by Ace
I remember the first time my defences were wtf bashed with 50k BS for what seemed like no profit. And the second. I think its or of a Shock and Awe type thing, just to say "not only do I have the ship numbers to destroy you, but I also have the resources to waste to do it." It's meant to make you nervous, to make you make mistakes. The third time around that I got hit with 50k BS, they made 300M+ profit.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:20 pm
by SPY
^^ if that is true then he who ever said that should not ever complain in forum if someone did not showed sportsmanship. saying hitting a defense out of spite is not good sportsmanship and if coming in here after a kill and demand sportsmanship i would dub thee a "hypocrite".

apart from that coming to the current context a player him/herself is responsible of his or her colonies safety. may it be with better words with fellow players or with keeping the planets dried out (yes keep them low in res you might say its a drag or chore to do so but i have seen the best turtle in game history, you all know who i am referring to do a colony farm twice a day just so he doesnt get robbed off his stuffs).

unless you cannot do so you hardly can complain. still a game and defense bashing is perfectly within game capacity. the primary objective of defense bashing is to make a final profit out of the defense if that final profit is not in the sight i doubt any sane player would hit a turtle.

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:46 pm
by Witchywoman
My question would be who did you or one of your alliance members make mad? :think:

Re: Does that seem right to you?

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:19 pm
by Ace
SPY wrote:^^ if that is true then he who ever said that should not ever complain in forum if someone did not showed sportsmanship. saying hitting a defense out of spite is not good sportsmanship and if coming in here after a kill and demand sportsmanship i would dub thee a "hypocrite".

apart from that coming to the current context a player him/herself is responsible of his or her colonies safety. may it be with better words with fellow players or with keeping the planets dried out (yes keep them low in res you might say its a drag or chore to do so but i have seen the best turtle in game history, you all know who i am referring to do a colony farm twice a day just so he doesnt get robbed off his stuffs).

unless you cannot do so you hardly can complain. still a game and defense bashing is perfectly within game capacity. the primary objective of defense bashing is to make a final profit out of the defense if that final profit is not in the sight i doubt any sane player would hit a turtle.
Wait...did I just get called a hypocrite?