I know in other games it is possible to declare on an alliance as a single player but not vice versa. IMO this is unfair and I think its a rule that the mods/admin should look into. But thats just my opinion.

Squirrel wrote:I know in other games it is possible to declare on an alliance as a single player but not vice versa. IMO this is unfair and I think its a rule that the mods/admin should look into. But thats just my opinion.

6.Alliances can declare war on individuals and vice versa.
*Maximum ammount of wars from alliances against specific invididuals: 2
*Maximum ammount of wars from individuals against specific alliances: 1



-Istalris-

Istalris wrote:

Squirrel wrote:I know in other games it is possible to declare on an alliance as a single player but not vice versa. IMO this is unfair and I think its a rule that the mods/admin should look into. But thats just my opinion.

6.Alliances can declare war on individuals and vice versa.
*Maximum ammount of wars from alliances against specific invididuals: 2
*Maximum ammount of wars from individuals against specific alliances: 1



-Istalris-

I think he meant look into,,, like look into changing it. What I dont understand is that you can have 2 wars created by alliance against one person, but that one person could only have one war against you? could you explain that to me plz?

Spankie wrote: I think he meant look into,,, like look into changing it. What I dont understand is that you can have 2 wars created by alliance against one person, but that one person could only have one war against you? could you explain that to me plz?

I think the reasoning behind it is that when an alliance declares war on an individual, the bashing rule is removed only for that one person.

When an individual declares war upon an alliance the bashing rule will be removed for a whole lot more targets. Imagine this; a top ranking player declares war on an alliance new to the game, just out of protection and with tasty treats all over the place. The bashing rule is removed for the whole lot of them, if this were to happen to more than one alliance, the amount of unlimited targets that one person could have would be enormous, don't you agree?

In some ways it makes sense, in others it dosen't. Zorg has a reason behind it though i guess.

-Istalris-

I think it is how many wars you can declare.
An alliance can declare war on 2 different individuals. And an individual can declare war only on a single alliance.

TOPIC SPLIT AND MOVED. -neoshagrath

I know it is allowable in this game, I just thought it was unfair. The was I see it, ~V~ could declare on a player just over 10k (We wouldnt) and drive the player out of the game which is unfair. Thats just my view, just wondering if others feel the same way.

The rules I wrote initially prohibited alliances declaring on individuals and visa versa. Zorg felt those rules were too restrictive to promote game play and put the current rules in place.

I agree that they should be changed to protect the individual.

I know i should put this comment in suggestions, but if it was done on a point system this could be made more fair. Have it so that if an alliance declares war on a person, that person has to be within the points of the alliance(make a point range,idk). Just an idea.