Re: Forum Suggestion: Union of Honor

#52
Squirrel wrote:Haha, this thread is funny. Slash, while I still agree with your point, me being number 1 doesnt make my opinion matter any more than anyone elses. I think that looking at who is "for" and "against" in this topic really displays who has experience in other similar games (You know the one). In that game it isnt a rule but when people do post the hits against them, they get ridiculed.
Actually, when I was a moderator for that "similar game" it was illegal for a loser to post a hit- for many of the same reasons posted in this topic. It is indeed bad etiquette and, I believe it shows poor sportsmanship.

But obviously that viewpoint isn't shared by too many in the community, so I'll retract the proposal and offer this topic for closure at the moderator's discretion.

Re: Forum Suggestion: Union of Honor

#57
As I stated before I do feel that it would be courteous for the loser to at least wait 24 hours before posting allowing the winner time to post. I am going to be messaging admin's about it to see if something along this line can be integrated into the rules for the UOH. No guarantee's but we shall see what their take is on it. In the mean time do continue to weigh the pro's and con's in here as I will be adding the link to this topic for their review.
Image
Just when you thought your were in control... I proved you wrong!

Re: Forum Suggestion: Union of Honor

#59
whether I am winner or loser, how big, or how small, whether i'm top 100, top 50, top 10 or #1, I could care less if you post or not. Get the game skills that allow you to prosper, continually put yourself on the left column of a CR and have some fun!! If I hit you and you are the loser..post away if you feel to. If I get hit and I'm the loser, i'll post if i feel to as well.
Image
cron