Page 1 of 1
					
			
				2 cruisers or 1 battleship
				Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:45 am
				by OneWingedAngel
				with no rapid fire is there any advantage cruisers have over battleships?
a battleship is cheaper than 2 cruisers and the BS has more weapons and shields than 2 cruisers so why choose the cruiser over the battleship?
is there another factor i havent thought of?
			 
					
			
				Re: 2 cruisers or 1 battleship
				Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:08 am
				by Urweirdsaysi
				Fodder. I used to use Cruisers as secondary fodder. Bit more expensive, but it helps soften the blow a bit.
Thats about all, I think. That and they are uber-fast.
			 
					
			
				Re: 2 cruisers or 1 battleship
				Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:48 pm
				by supercow
				I dont buy cruisers, i  only have 15 of them.
I dont think cruisers should cost deuterium, if they didnt cost deuterium i would have 100s of them.
			 
					
			
				Re: 2 cruisers or 1 battleship
				Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:59 pm
				by Thatguyeric
				It's only 2.5k. How can it make that much of a difference?
			 
					
			
				Re: 2 cruisers or 1 battleship
				Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:01 pm
				by supercow
				it can on my level of play, remember i still have only 14k points, so i dont have a lot of deuterium like you guys do, so it makes a huge difference to me.
			 
					
			
				Re: 2 cruisers or 1 battleship
				Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:01 pm
				by decadence
				Even a 1k deuterium is a large sum for a ship if you build thousands of it.
Cruisers are good in a world with Rapid Fire (taking into consideration it's speed and fuel consumption)
And currently, I don't believe in fodders. Ships with the least structure points go down first. They also go down more easier than a bigger ships (which equals it's cost) I only use fodder to protect my LCs on a raid (LF only).