That's twice as much as Destroyers; if this is supposed to be a transport ship, it's not doing it's job.

Weresloth wrote:That's twice as much as Destroyers; if this is supposed to be a transport ship, it's not doing it's job.

actualyl its 20x the amount of destroyers, way too high, should stay as it was before imo, since its a transport ship and nothing else

Shandris wrote:actualyl its 20x the amount of destroyers

Even worse.

Hmm, seems that the large cargo was a bad one to take as measurement.

So we you want to keep consumption of 150 ? Not even 1000 or 500 at the very worse?

150-300 seems good to me.

Weresloth wrote:150-300 seems good to me.

seconded

this is a ship with 10 million cargo space.... i think that 150 is insanely low.

It could just be slow. RIPs consumption is 1, but they hold 1 Million. But everyone already knew that

agree with bouncer even if you halved what it would take for 400 LC to move that much the 10,000 would not be all that unreasonable.

break it down per galaxy travel for 400LC from galaxy 1...to move 10mil res
to G2..45.712
to G3..91.413
to G4..137.131
to G5..182.862
to G6..228.575
to G7..274.302
to G8..319.972
to G9..365.745

now to move the same amount of res even at half deut consumption of 10.000 you get to halve those numbers and still gettin a good deal.

if it goes as low as 150 this thing better move like a turtle or you are gonna end up making 2 other ships extremely useless..1 imo already is unless you are trying to move gas into place for a hit faster.

Weresloth wrote:It could just be slow. RIPs consumption is 1, but they hold 1 Million. But everyone already knew that

RIP consumption has been changed.

We might add a cost of 1 ruby to build the particular ship.