Some players high end so claimed fleeters think that they have mono poly over ze targets. lol what a douch bag.
If a possible attack target is found taking hits who is dumb enough to say that that target cannot be hit cause another player was ahead with attacking that target already?
These sort of stupid minds even claim sportsmanship. There is a reason ppl play within alliance and compete across alliances. Bullying out competition with a bigger fleet in game is understandable but to whine at players that hey u are taking my attacks dont attack this player dont attack that player what kind of stupid request is that?
sometimes i really feel that this game have gathered some really insensible personalities. sad to see this kind of under arm unsportsmanship behavior going on from so called top players. epitome of sportsmanship my ***.
Sorry if this is considered trolling, i just felt this issue needs discussing in open forum as this takes out the playing environment moral.
Re: ZE attack target monopoly mapping.
#2That is bad, and why is not anyone can attack anyone if you have the firepower simple rules
Re: ZE attack target monopoly mapping.
#3if you have the fleet use ot. of someone complains about it then they was just too slow in the attack. dont see any problem with that. if you can not hit your normal farms them look to others to play with. hunting is the best part of the game.
Re: ZE attack target monopoly mapping.
#4We are not talking about hunting. We are talking about harassing players in the name of game play.DuctTape wrote:if you have the fleet use ot. of someone complains about it then they was just too slow in the attack. dont see any problem with that. if you can not hit your normal farms them look to others to play with. hunting is the best part of the game.
Barbaric nomad causing P-A-I-N.
Re: ZE attack target monopoly mapping.
#5Funny spy, your starting to see how I lost my reputation so fast.
Re: ZE attack target monopoly mapping.
#6Wow, somebody asked you not to attack someone else because they wanted to attack that target. Lame.
I say if you can attack that player, have at it. I do.
I say if you can attack that player, have at it. I do.